SkillsNav interviews your workforce by AI voice — a natural spoken conversation, not a form — and turns those conversations into a structured skills inventory. From the inventory it finds the gaps against the roles you care about, maps who-knows-what across the org, and tells you what to train and who to hire.
Free-form speech in, structured analytics out. Know which knob to turn before you spend a training budget or open a req.

Most organizations have no real map of the skills their workforce actually holds. HR systems track titles and certifications, not what people can do. So when you want to staff a new initiative, find where expertise concentrates, or decide whether a gap should be closed by training or by hiring, the honest answer is usually a spreadsheet built from guesswork.
Surveys get ignored. Manager assessments are subjective and don't scale. The signal is buried in noise — and you end up tuning the wrong knob.
SkillsNav is a two-surface product: an interview surface that assesses individuals, and an executive dashboard that aggregates everything into org-wide intelligence.
A natural spoken conversation with each employee — not a survey. People talk; the AI listens and probes.
Speech is normalized onto a shared taxonomy, so two people's answers map onto the same comparable skills inventory.
Gap analysis against the roles and initiatives you care about, plus a who-knows-what map of where expertise actually lives.
Actionable recommendations: each gap maps to a specific course or a hiring profile — not generic advice.
Assesses individuals through a fluid spoken interview and returns each person their own skills profile. The surface employees touch — measured, conversational, never a chore.
Aggregates everything into org-wide analytics: campaigns, a skills library, reports, and cross-campaign trends for leadership. The surface that turns the inventory into decisions.
SkillsNav is white-label and multi-tenant by design. It was built with a corporate-training partner — where every gap maps straight onto that partner's own course catalog — but the same platform fits any enterprise weighing whether to train or to hire.
HR and L&D leaders get capability they can plan against. Executives get a defensible answer to where expertise lives and where it is thin.

The core engineering: conduct a fluid spoken interview and reliably extract a normalized, comparable inventory — so two employees' answers land on the same taxonomy. Free-form speech in, structured analytics out.
Train-vs-hire is only useful if it points at something actionable. Gaps map to a specific course catalog and to hiring profiles — never generic advice you can't execute on.
Re-skinnable per customer, runs many organizations, and interviews in more than one language — with a pathway to SOC-2 for enterprise procurement.
Keeping the per-employee assessment app and the executive analytics app consistent over shared workforce data is a non-trivial data-modeling problem — and where most skills tools quietly fall apart.
Specified and scoped as a 30-day MVP with a corporate-training partner; in active development.
Bring us your roles, your initiatives, and your catalog. We'll show you the gaps — and tell you which knob to turn.