SkillsNav interviews your workforce by AI voice (a natural spoken conversation, not a form) and turns those conversations into a structured skills inventory. From the inventory it finds the gaps against the roles you care about, maps who-knows-what across the org, and tells you what to train and who to hire.
Free-form speech in, structured analytics out. Know which knob to turn before you spend a training budget or open a req.

Most organizations have no real map of the skills their workforce actually holds. HR systems track titles and certifications, not what people can do. So when you want to staff a new initiative, find where expertise concentrates, or decide whether a gap should be closed by training or by hiring, the honest answer is usually a spreadsheet built from guesswork.
Surveys get ignored. Manager assessments are subjective and don't scale. The signal is buried in noise, and you end up tuning the wrong knob.
SkillsNav is a two-surface product: an interview surface that assesses individuals, and an executive dashboard that aggregates everything into org-wide intelligence.
A natural spoken conversation with each employee, not a survey. People talk; the AI listens and probes.
Speech is normalized onto a shared taxonomy, so two people's answers map onto the same comparable skills inventory.
Gap analysis against the roles and initiatives you care about, plus a who-knows-what map of where expertise actually lives.
Actionable recommendations: each gap maps to a specific course or a hiring profile, not generic advice.
Assesses individuals through a fluid spoken interview and returns each person their own skills profile. The surface employees touch: measured, conversational, never a chore.
Aggregates everything into org-wide analytics: campaigns, a skills library, reports, and cross-campaign trends for leadership. The surface that turns the inventory into decisions.
SkillsNav is white-label and multi-tenant by design. It was built with a corporate-training partner, where every gap maps straight onto that partner's own course catalog, but the same platform fits any enterprise weighing whether to train or to hire.
HR and L&D leaders get capability they can plan against. Executives get a defensible answer to where expertise lives and where it is thin.

The core engineering: conduct a fluid spoken interview and reliably extract a normalized, comparable inventory, so two employees' answers land on the same taxonomy. Free-form speech in, structured analytics out.
Train-vs-hire is only useful if it points at something actionable. Gaps map to a specific course catalog and to hiring profiles, never generic advice you can't execute on.
Re-skinnable per customer, runs many organizations, and interviews in more than one language, with a pathway to SOC-2 for enterprise procurement.
Keeping the per-employee assessment app and the executive analytics app consistent over shared workforce data is a non-trivial data-modeling problem. It is where most skills tools quietly fall apart.
Scoped and shipped as a 30-day MVP with a corporate-training partner. Interviews run, the inventory and gap analysis land in the dashboard, and the product is in use.
Bring us your roles, your initiatives, and your catalog. We'll show you the gaps and tell you which knob to turn.